DRIVE SYSTEM UPGRADES
DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE QUALIFICATION ESSENTIAL TO Doing it Right
Production goals are ever changing and usually in an
upward direction. For example, production management may dictate that belt
conveyors run faster and with an increase in loads. Sometimes, the
production managers who set new production goals do not realize how
wide-ranging the ramifications of those decisions can be on the plant
engineers and maintenance team responsible for designing and maintaining
the machinery driving production. Production change can affect the entire
drive system, so what steps should a plant engineer take?
Design/Maintenance Teams
The first step is to create a plant engineering/maintenance staff team
to design and implement the necessary drive system upgrade.
Representatives from the engineering and maintenance departments are
essential, because the upgrade process has two distinct phases, including
design and maintenance evaluations. The design phase determines the power
and mechanical needs of the upgraded drive train system and is usually
undertaken by plant engineering. System designers must develop an overall
scheme for powering the new higher loads.
Subsequently, the maintenance department must undertake a careful and
thorough review of the current drive system components that may be
utilized in the upgraded system.
It is essential that these steps be carried out in tandem, as doing one
without the other is likely to result in downtime at a later stage when
the upgraded system is required to drive the new
loads.
Drive Upgrade Design Considerations
Many drive systems, such as conveyor belts or paper machines, may have
several drive "stations" along the production line. However, for
simplicity and clarity, this article will focus on describing the upgrade
of one drive station connected to the driven equipment on the production
line. The principles and practices described apply to one or more drive
units.
After determining the overall power requirements of the new production
line, plant engineers must qualify the motor and gear drive rpm,
horsepower, torque and thermal rating requirements of the drive train.
Questions that should be asked include:
- Is a higher horsepower motor needed?
- Does the motor rpm need to change?
- Will the existing motor do the job?
- Do the gear drive and coupling horsepower, output torque, and
mechanical and thermal ratings meet the new system's
requirements?
Horsepower, RPM and Torque
Horsepower, rpm and torque must all be taken into account in qualifying
the design phase of the upgrade. Once the new loads on the driven
equipment are determined, the best step to take is calling in a gear drive
manufacturer's representative to analyze whether the existing power
transmission components rate both mechanically and thermally and can be
utilized in the upgrade.
It is not enough to look only at the gear drive's nameplate to
determine if it will meet the new mechanical requirements. For example, a
common mistake involves the evaluation of Service Factors (SF). An SF of
1.5 on the nameplate does not mean that the drive can handle a 50%
increase in horsepower (assuming it was running at an SF of 1.0). The
upper range of the SF number indicates the drive's ability to handle
momentary peaks, not continuous duty operations.
Another common mistake is assuming that changing one factor in the
equation will not affect the rating requirements of another component in
the drive system. For example, changing the motor rpm will affect the
power rating requirements of the gear drive. It is also not true, as some
people assume, that an upgrade designed to slow the system will result in
easier operations for the gear drive. A slow down on the low-speed shaft
increases the drive's output torque and the drive system may end up with a
high-torque requirement.
Thermal Ratings
Qualifying the system for thermal rating is as important as doing so
for rpm, horsepower and torque. The upgrade may cause a change in the
drive system that alters the thermal requirements. The old thermal ratings
may not be sufficient to handle the requirements of the upgraded drive
system. Larger-sized drives or auxiliary cooling devices, such as fans or
another type of heat exchanger, may be required. A metering oil pan may
need to be added to the drive. It is more cost-effective to determine
these requirements in the qualifying stage than learn of them after system
start-up and discover the need to plumb water, run electrical lines for
cooling devices, or disassemble the drive to add an oil pan.
Following design phase findings, one of several scenarios is likely.
The old equipment does not rate and new equipment is required, some
machinery may rate and can be utilized, or perhaps all the old equipment
rates and can be configured to power the new loads.
Drive
Upgrade Maintenance Qualification Considerations
Maintenance is the second step in the upgrade qualification process and
applies to those existing drive components that meet the new requirements
established in the design phase. However, just because the "old" gear
drive and couplings are rated appropriately for the new system, it is not
simply a matter of connecting a motor to the gear drive and calling the
upgrade process complete. The drive components must be carefully inspected
to ensure they are in good condition to assume new loading. If problems
are discovered, repairs can be made or replacement parts ordered before
system start-up.
Qualifying Bearings
A complete inspection of the gear drive bearings is one of the most
important maintenance steps in the qualifying process, and the gear
drive's operational history will dictate the condition of the
bearings.
It is essential to inspect the bearings and gear drive housing bearing
bores, as if it is worn, it can lead to premature bearing failure, which
may result in a catastrophic failure of the gear drive.
It does not take an expert to determine that a bearing is in bad shape.
First, remove the drive housing cover and inspect the bearing cage for
wear or cracks. Next, inspect the bearings, turn the rollers and make sure
there is no surface distress. Visual inspection of the rollers and racers
may reveal shallow holes in the surface (pitting), scuff marks, pealing of
metal, spalling or scoring.
Rust on the rollers is an indication of tiny microscopic holes. It may
currently be a marginal problem, but it would be unwise to start an
upgrade on a bearing that may become a major problem in six
months.
Replace all bearings that show wear distress or that have
been in operation for a significant amount of time. It is more
cost-effective to replace the bearings during the qualification process
than later replacing a gear drive that failed catastrophically due to a
bad bearing. It could cost thousands of dollars to replace the gear drive
alone; not to mention the cost of lost production time.

|
Cracked or worn bearing cages must be
replaced during the upgrade qualification
stage.
|
Qualify Gearing
It is important to qualify the gearing, ensuring it is in good
condition before demanding more of it in the commitment to higher
loads.
Prior to the upgrade, the drive gearing has been meshing over the
history of the application in a certain load zone. When the application is
changed, causing the drive to work harder, the load zone will also change.
As a result, the relative position of the components may change, causing
non-worn gear teeth to mesh with worn gear teeth. A change from a previous
"match" of worn-on-worn to non-worn-on-worn teeth may result in broken
gear teeth.
As with bearings, a complete visual inspection of the gearing should be
done in the field, and again it does not require a gear technician with
sophisticated equipment to identify serious wear conditions. If it is
serious, it will be obvious. For example, broken teeth, holes from pitting
and spalling (indicated by areas where a large amount of surface material
has broken away) will be evident, as will wear ridges, rippling from
plastic flow (a condition where the metal is not removed, but is moved
around on the gearing surface) and other wear conditions. Seriously worn
gearing should be replaced.
Comparing the working flank and trailing flank of gears and pinions is
sound field qualification. Generally speaking, there is significant wear
if there is a noticeable difference in shape between the two flanks. Take
corrective measures if there is a difference in shape.

|
The photo illustrates a dedendum pitted
gear tooth. Dedendum pitting may result when loads are at or close
to maximum allowable surface loading values. The gear or pinion
should be replaced, if found in this condition, during the upgrade
qualification process.
|

|
Excessive bearing and housing-bore
wear, soft-foot, and shaft misalignment may result in improper gear
tooth face contact and subsequent possible tooth failure.
| Qualify Drive
Housing and Shafts
The most important aspect when qualifying the drive housing is making
sure the bearing bores are sized correctly and round.
Shafts must be in good condition to ensure proper coupling connections.
Fretting is one problem to look for, as this disrupts the shaft surface
(like a plastic flow condition) and can lead to stress and eventual shaft
failure. Fretting is typically caused by misalignment or by the coupling
being too loose on the shaft. Therefore, shaft surfaces adjacent to
coupling fits and keyways should be qualified for the proper size and for
distress, and be repaired or replaced if needed.
Couplings
Qualified In Two Areas
Couplings should be inspected for evidence of fretting and for
correctness of bore diameters. Wear on the inside perimeter of the
coupling may lead to a loose fit and eventual failure under the new higher
load requirements. Coupling/shaft keyways and keys should also be visually
inspected for wear.
The connecting elements of the couplings should be inspected for wear
and correct meshing. For example, the gear teeth on a gear-type coupling
should be inspected in a fashion similar to the drive gearing. Grid-type
couplings should be inspected to make sure the grids are slotting
correctly and for signs of cracking, breakage or other wear on the steel
grid elements. Disc couplings are easily inspected for cracking on the
diaphragm. Rubber element or elastomer couplings should be inspected for
element cracking and distortion from stretching.
Drive
Systems Rooted In Strong Foundations
It is important for the new drive system to have a sound and rigid
foundation to ensure it can handle the new load assignments. Problems in
the foundation may lead to drive shaft and gearing distortions that may
result in misalignment and eventual system failure. Inspect the foundation
for physical deterioration, such as cracks in the concrete or distortion
in the steel. Look for looseness between the base plate and the
foundation. Movement in this area can lead to unwanted vibrations in the
system. Foundation repairs should be made before upgrade start-up.
Solving the Problems
Once the above steps to qualify a drive system for new loads have been
carried out, it is hoped that the drive system will have the required
mechanical and thermal ratings to meet the new loads, and the maintenance
inspection will show everything to be in good operational order, so the
drive system is prepared to handle the increased production demand.
However, that may be too much to hope for. Chances are some components
will need to be replaced and/or renewed. Costs and lead times are factors
to consider in determining whether to buy new components rather than
repair existing components. For many components, repair may cost less than
buying new equipment, whereas for others, it is more cost-effective and
faster to buy new components.
There are a few options to consider, regarding refurbishing or
repairing equipment. Some repairs and refurbishment can be undertaken by a
facility's maintenance staff. This is especially true in those areas that
fall into regular or preventive maintenance normally carried out by the
maintenance staff, such as simple foundation repairs, adding cooling
devices and coupling maintenance. However, other repairs are more
problematic, including flopping gearing, repairing fretted shafts,
returning bearing bores to specifications and repairing broken gear teeth.
In those cases, it would be sensible to send the machinery out for repair
to a gear drive manufacturer or a qualified local repair shop.
A number of gear drive manufacturers will renew a gear drive to "like
new" conditions, at a cost guaranteed to be less than that of a new drive,
and offer a one-year new drive warranty. A renewed gear drive enhances the
reliability of the new drive system and helps assure that uptime will be
maximized following the upgrade.

|
Before and after -- Some gear drive
manufacturers will renew a gear drive to "like new" conditions at a
cost guaranteed to be less than that of a new drive, and offer a
one-year new drive
warranty.
|
Torsional
Critical Issues
The issue of "torsional critical" (due to torsional windup forces)
comes into play in the upgrading of the drive system. Every drive train
system has a torsional critical zone, during which the system is out of
balance at some point in its operating range. It is manifested by a
serious vibration problem that must be addressed and solved before a
catastrophic failure occurs. Most of the time, the torsional critical
point is outside the normal operating range of the drive system and does
not represent an operational problem.
For example, if the low-speed side shaft of the drive system is turning
at a normal operational speed of 50 rpm, the torsional critical point may
be 15 rpm. In this scenario, the operation quickly passes through the
torsional critical zone on its way to normal operating speeds.
Every component in the drive system, from the motor to driven equipment
components, has torsional windup. Regardless of how little windup each
component may have, it is still present and, at some point, the forces
react together in combination with the "perfect" load, and then it becomes
critical. A typical symptom is a rattling gear drive.
Changes in the system parameters, such as increasing or decreasing rpm,
increasing loads, or both, affect the torsional critical point's location
in the upgraded system. Predicting the torsional critical zone ahead of
time, such as during the design phase, is very difficult and probably not
worth the time and effort to do so. However, it is an important factor to
monitor during start-up. If vibrations are evident during start-up, the
upgraded drive system may be operating in the torsional critical zone.
This also reinforces the necessity to qualify the upgraded drive system
for design and maintenance considerations. This is because it will be
extremely difficult to diagnose the source of a vibration problem
discovered at start-up, if only the design ratings were qualified and not
the physical condition of the machinery. However, if a vibration problem
occurs during the start-up of the upgrade, and there was no history of
vibration problems with the previous drive configuration, it is likely
that it is attributable to the torsional critical zone.
There are several options of fixing torsional critical, but the most
common and simple fix is to change out one or more couplings to decrease
or increase stiffness. Replacing a "softer" grid coupling with a "rigid"
disc coupling, or vice versa, may solve the problem.
Benchmarks and Monitoring
Once the new drive system is up and running, it is recommended to take
a benchmark measurement of vibratory loads, and temperature and noise
levels. Continue to monitor the system at regular intervals and compare
measurements to the benchmark. Troubleshoot any change from the benchmark,
should they occur. Finding any possible problems and promptly taking
preventive maintenance measures will reduce the chance for catastrophic
failure.
The next time production management dictates faster speed and higher
production loads, use these recommendations as a guideline to a successful
drive system upgrade.
|